Responses to a range of Questions and Answers are provided here. Please email TEIReform@facs.nsw.gov.au to pose further questions not answered here.
The way we commission services will change gradually, with the timing of the change determined by local collaborative planning processes with services.
The change will be driven by the needs of clients. This gradual change will be informed by the targeted earlier intervention (TEI) outcomes framework, and will involve a transition to evidence-informed practice over time, whilst also supporting innovation.
This will ensure greater equity and transparency in the way TEI services are commissioned.
Districts will work with services locally to design, plan and transition to the new TEI system. The local collaborative planning process is designed to transition services to the new system. There may be instances, where for some services, negotiated transition is unsuccessful. On these occasions, local tendering of funding may arise, and Districts will adopt various tendering models to suit local conditions.
District service system design and planning sessions with services will begin in October 2016. Dependant on District planning, service transition will begin from the end of 2016 calendar year and continue through early 2017.
The district design and planning process will inform funding decisions from June 2017.
FACS will develop a TEI outcomes framework. This framework, over time, will help to inform how we move towards outcome based contracting.
FACS will apply a mix of outcome-based and output-based contracting with longer contract duration, and a flexible performance framework that accommodates a more holistic set of performance criteria relevant to service streams. Peak agencies have previously undertaken some work in measuring outcomes.
Yes. One of the aims of the TEI reform is to focus decision-making on the design and delivery of local services within the broad reform directions framework.
An evidence-informed support plan will be developed and ideally this will be designed with service providers, clients and may be informed by current pilots and co-design processes.
Districts will undertake planning with services to suit local conditions and needs. District planning will be guided by clear parameters of the new program structure, the TEI outcomes framework, district budgets, and local data.
The consultation process told us that, while TEI reform could be effective at a local level, central leadership will be important to driving a common agenda and achieving reform outcomes. A range of formal governance arrangements will be developed, which will include a central governance group as well as local governance groups for better system integration.
Over time, common processes, structures and system enablers will be developed across all agencies working with children, young people and families. Tools such as standard assessment frameworks, referral pathways, data collection and infrastructure will be considered.
Service systems will be enhanced to streamline reporting and information-gathering and information-sharing. Practitioner capacity will be built through training, professional development and support.
The TEI will continue to focus on the important role of community strengthening activities to provide a continuum of services for communities, children young people and families.
In the short to medium-term we will deliver the commissioning of services within current District TEI budgets so that Districts can better target services to client needs. In the long term we will develop more extensive resource allocation methods.
New approaches are needed to improve access, to and awareness of, services for priority ‘at risk’ groups, including Aboriginal children, young people and families.
Aboriginal communities are best placed to understand their own needs and shape their own futures in collaboration with government and other services. Districts will be required to ensure Aboriginal people are adequately represented and empowered in the design, delivery and evaluation of services.
An Aboriginal Services Strategy is being developed and will be embedded into each element of the reform process to ensure each element delivers improved outcomes for Aboriginal children, young people, families and communities, and ensure growth in the capacity of Aboriginal organisations.
On 7 July 2016, the FACS Secretary announced changes to the management of FACS Districts and state-wide services that will take place over the next year.
Existing district boundaries will remain but will be grouped together from later this year. TEI planning and design will be undertaken at the local level, including ensuring that current district boundaries and the needs of people within those boundaries are recognised.
Answer: No. Targeted earlier intervention program funding of over $150 million will not be reduced as a result of the reform process.
Answer: We are not deciding future funding distribution until the shape of reform is determined and Districts have undertaken local consultation and planning. The first stage in the Targeted Earlier Intervention Program Reform is to work with stakeholders to examine strengths and potential areas for improvement in the current system.
Answer: We will not decide on the process for allocating future funding until the shape of reform is determined and Districts have undertaken local consultation and planning.
Answer: No decision has been made about the future service model(s). Decisions about the service model(s) will not be made until the initial consultation process is complete and the shape of reform is determined.
Answer: Yes, community development is an important element in breaking the cycles of disadvantage. One of the aims of the reform is to ensure community programs can better support the most disadvantaged families and communities.
Answer: The Targeted Earlier Intervention Program Reform is revisiting programs and funding parameters within the present context to design a contemporary service system that reflects current demographics and evidence. There is much good work in the sector but our efforts can be better coordinated, more consistent and directed to those most in need. Through consultation we have been seeking information about what is working and what we could do more of, in addition to what we could be doing better.
Answer: Service providers have been encouraged to provide feedback through the consultation process about what they would like to see in a more flexible and less standardised approach should look like in a contemporary service system.
Answer: The aim of the reform is to provide a better service system, based on local feedback combined with evidence about what works from around the world. We have no predetermined ideas about the number and size of services needed.
Answer: Ultimately, it is disadvantaged children, young people, families, and their communities who will be affected by the reform. They will have better, more flexible services that will help them before they reach crisis point. Service providers funded under FACS’ targeted earlier intervention programs will be impacted, whether through participation in the planning and design stage, a reorientation of current services or a redesign of the local service system.
Answer: The overall reform timeframe will depend on district planning; transition and implementation approaches that may be undertaken; and transition readiness. A broad timeline includes:
|Initial consultation||Consolidation and feedback||Policy directions and service design||Service system design planning in districts||Transition planning and implementation|
|August – December 2015||November 2015 – March 2016||March – September 2016||October 2016 – June 2017||commences July 2017|
Answer: The scope of what is being considered as part of the reform process will depend on feedback throughout the consultation process. Service providers are encouraged to raise these types of issues and make suggestions about a preferred approach.
Answer: One of the aims of reform stated in the Sector Consultation paper is the creation of a service system continuum grounded in evidence-based best practice and focused on client needs. We expect to have a broad range of service offerings available within a redesigned TEI system. However the services available within each community will depend on local need.
Answer: Programs considered under the current Targeted Earlier Intervention program include:
Triple P, an activity provided via a number of programs, was also considered.
Answer: The ‘What you told us’ report will help to inform the policy directions taken. Existing data as well as research on effective evidence-based practice, analysis of evaluation reports and reviews of service systems in other local and international jurisdictions, will also be used to inform the directions.
Answer: The ‘What you told us’ report marks the end of Phase Two of the reform. We are now focusing on Phase Three, “Reform Directions and Service Design” with a paper outlining these directions due to be released mid 2016.
Answer: As part of the reform reporting will be streamlined, we will be exploring new systems for collecting and analysing data and will provide training in these systems.
Answer: Any decisions made around resourcing models will take into consideration reporting requirements.
Answer: Yes. Twelve consultation sessions have been held specifically with Aboriginal stakeholders across the state and Aboriginal client feedback has been a priority focus in client surveys and consultation sessions.
Answer: The Minister will consider and approve the summary paper based on the feedback from the consultation process. This paper will include key issues and suggestions for improvement. FACS provides regular updates to the Minister on the reform, reports and feedback.
Answer: Yes. There is regular communication between peak bodies and FACS, including:
Answer: Consultation with the Commonwealth is occurring at both the central office and local levels. Our commonwealth colleagues will be key partners in the local planning processes.
Answer: We consulted extensively with key stakeholders - service providers, clients, Aboriginal stakeholders, FACS staff, state and local government and other related organisations.
We ran 37 focus groups attended by over 1,200 participants, including 11 focus groups with Aboriginal stakeholders.
Answer: All feedback was taken into consideration. Common themes were taken into account and consolidated into the final report.
Answer: Each district will make decisions about local planning processes based on a state wide framework. This framework cannot be finalised until the scope and direction of the reforms have been determined.
Answer: TEI reform will centre around local decision making. Local planning will be done in partnership with local stakeholders to build on local assets and strengths, and avoid duplication.
Answer: All key stakeholders were invited to respond to the online survey. The FACS website will be updated with information throughout the reform process. FACS district staff will continue to play an important role in keeping local stakeholders informed.
Answer: FACS’ vision for localisation includes:
Answer: The review of the research and practice for prevention and early intervention undertaken by ARACY defined ‘early intervention’ as activities, programs and services designed to alter behaviour or development of individuals who show signs of an identified problem, or who exhibit risk factors or vulnerabilities, by providing resources and skills necessary to combat the identified risks. ‘Prevention’ refers to activities, programs and services designed to prevent those identified risks emerging in the first place.
Answer: Targeted approaches cater for individuals or families experiencing or at significantly heightened risk of specific issues (in contrast to universal or primary approaches offered to all individuals and families that are general preventative in nature).
Answer: We will consider the need for training and professional development once the scope of reform has been determined and may vary according to the design of each local system. This is part of the implementation stage of the reform process.